The phrase "failure to communicate" became iconic in American English from the 1967 film "Cool Hand Luke," in which Paul Newman played a convict who refuses to listen or follow orders. The film raised questions about the multiple ways we understand “failure to communicate” and its consequences. Is it sometimes a decision to resist a presumption, a premise, an interpretation, an argument, a directive from authority? Is it at other times simply a mechanical failure? This course examines “failure to communicate” in multiple cultural areas, among them literature, romance, politics, theater, law, science, war, psychology, philosophy, business, religion, humor and education. In addition to our manageable reading in nonfiction, journalism and scholarship, we watch 24 movies (no cost to you) and bring literary, philosophical, psychological and historical perspectives to these issues. Materials will include literary fiction (e.g., works by Herman Melville and Toni Morrison), theater (e.g., "A Chorus Line"), poetry (e.g., Robert Frost’s “Home Burial”) film (e.g., "Cyrano," "I Am Sam," "A Quiet Passion," "The Wolf of Wall Street"). We’ll also experiment, trying some role-playing communication exercises with students: a couple breaking up, a U.S. general talking to a Russian general, a novelist trying to explain to an editor why some material shouldn’t be cut, a back-and-forth between a stopped driver and a police officer. Finally, we’ll ask whether failure to communicate is always a bad thing, as well as how to avoid its worst consequences. Requirements: a 6-page midterm paper, a 15-page final paper, 10 short (up to two paragraphs) ungraded critical comments on assigned reading or viewing over the term, and active participation in class discussion.